“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”
George Orwell
“But ef hugsun siðspilltur tungumál , tungumál geta einnig siðspilltur hugsun George Orwell
“But maybe thought rotten language , language be able to too rotten thought George Orwell
by Laugur
I would really have a happy if I had some buttermilk pancakes in front of me.
Ich würde wirklich ein glückliches haben, wenn ich einige Buttermilchpfannkuchen vor mir aß.
I would really have a happy, if I unite butter milk pancakes before me ASS.
What if I just copied whatever result I get and then push the button again?
どんな結果を私が再度得、次に私がちょうどコピーしたら何がボタンに押すか。
When I profit, me copy what kind of result for the second time next exactly, something pushes in the button?
by stay tuned
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
« Chinese (traditional) »
不願的上帝防止罪惡，但是能？
然后他不全能。
他是否是能，但是不願？
然后他是惡劣的。
他是否是兩能和願意的？
然后，自何處cometh罪惡？
他是否是兩者都不能亦不願意的？
然后為什麼電話他上帝？
Does not hope God prevents the evil, but energy?
Then he is not versatile.
Whether he is energy, but does not hope?
Then he is bad.
Whether he is two can with want?
Then, from where cometh evil?
Whether he is both cannot also not want?
Then why telephone he God?
